Aurora  Bautista Quicho
207 Albatross Lane
Fountain Valley, California

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF          ) CASE NO.  ZM007928
CALIFORNIA,                         )
                    Plaintiff       ) NOTICE
                                    ) OF INVALID RULING
             v.                     ) 
                                    )
Aurora Bautista Quicho,             ) 
                    Defendant.      )
                                    )
____________________________________)____________________________

1.  TO THE SHERIFF OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, THE DIRECTOR OF PATTON STATE HOSPITAL, AND ALL OTHERS ACTING IN CONCERT WITH THEM, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE OF THE FOLLOWING:

2.  The Minute Order issued by the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Mental Health Department 95 (see accompanying EXHIBIT “F”), is not a valid order for the following reasons:

A.	Said court is not a competent authority.
B.	Said Minute Order is not a regular order on its face.

SAID COURT 
IS NOT A COMPETENT AUTHORITY

3.  California Code of Civil Procedure, §262.1, acknowledges that if an order is issued by competent authority, then a sheriff or other ministerial officer is justified in the execution of the order.  However, a sheriff or other ministerial officer who knowingly executes an order not issued by competent authority may be subject to personal liability for such unauthorized execution.

4.  Said court is not a competent authority in this case because it is not a court of record as required by the 1879 California Constitution.  It fails on two points:

A.	It is not proceeding according to the common law.
B.	The tribunal is not independent of the magistrate who is conducting the proceedings (in this case the magistrate is acting as the tribunal).

5.  Further, Aurora Bautista Quicho has objected to the jurisdiction of the court not of record; thus, she has not agreed to allow an alternative nisi prius court to proceed.

SAID MINUTE ORDER
IS NOT A REGULAR ORDER ON ITS FACE

6.  California Code of Civil Procedure, §262.1, acknowledges that if an order is valid on its face, then a sheriff or other ministerial officer is justified in the execution of the order.  However, a sheriff or other ministerial officer who knowingly executes an order that he knows is not valid (and therefore not valid on its face) may be subject to personal liability for such unauthorized execution.

7.  This notice gives rise to the fact that said Minute Order, though it may have at one time been valid on its face, is not valid; it having been impeached by virtue that it is issued out of a court not of competent jurisdiction.

8.  Further, the Minute Order is not a genuine order of the Court, and it is not considered a part of the record of the court, but merely a part of the clerk’s minutes.
CONCLUSION

9.  Because the Minute Order is not created by the independent tribunal, but is created by the magistrate, it cannot be a valid order from a court of record.

10.  Because Aurora Bautista Quicho has object to, and not agreed to a nisi prius court, the said Court has exceeded its jurisdiction in issuing such an order.

11.  Further, Aurora Bautista Quicho is one of the people of California.  The State of California is instructed by the Legislature, via Government Code.  §100 states, “(a) The sovereignty of the state resides in the people thereof, and all writs and processes shall issue in their name.”  An attack the people (i.e. upon the sovereignty of the state) could constitute an act of high treason against the people.

12.  §11120 and §54950 each states, “The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them.”  Nowhere in the record is there any showing that Aurora Bautista Quicho, a people of California, has voluntarily yielded her sovereignty to the California government agencies.  In fact, a public defender was imposed over her objections (see the attached counterclaim and exhibits).  Further, she is not a surety for any fictional, limited liability entity.

13.  Therefore, anyone executing said Minute Order may be exceeding jurisdiction and may be subject to personal liability for any consequential injury (including the injury of involuntary deprivation of natural rights and of status as a people of this state).
							Aurora Bautista Quicho