----- Original Message ----- From: jonahdawson@aol.com To: slev@ix.netcom.com Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 1:04 PM Subject: Re: California Acknowledgement & Jurat.doc Remember brother, The government does not require us to accomplish the impossible. A few examples. The State Dept of Transportation said one MUST have a SSN to get a DL but we requested a SSN number from the SSN office for the sole purpose of getting a DL and no other purpose and they said they could not issue one just to get a DL. We gave this info to the DOT and they said, fine then you can get a DL without a SSN. We did not get the DL. In Fact the judge who ordered me to get a DL lets us drive in his jurisdiction without one because they could not issue a DL in our Christian names. Even the judges know they can not order us to accomplish the impossible. Jonah === 3 ==================================================================== -----Original Message----- From: Caleb 1 To: Caleb Sent: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 5:20 pm Subject: Fw: California Acknowledgement & Jurat.doc Hi everyone. I thought I should share Jeanne's response which is immediately below. == 2 ===================================================================== ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeanne To: 'Caleb 1' Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 12:29 PM Subject: RE: California Acknowledgement & Jurat.doc Exception? No, I could go to jail There are no more “personally known” … all must have ID recorded=passport, DL , state ID or I cannot notarize your sig Thumb print now required for Trust Deed So if it is required & you do not wish to do that, you may argue that with a notary at a Title company when doing that operation. The penalty of perjury is on ME I will resign as soon as possible if not on the anniversary in July == 1 ===================================================================== From: Caleb 1 [mailto:slev@ix.netcom.com] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 11:08 PM To: Jeanne Subject: Re: California Acknowledgement & Jurat.doc Jeanne, I appreciate and thank you for the Notary services you have provided Me and others in times past and allowing Us to use Our own Jurats and Acknowedgements on Our paperwork. It appears that things have changed and maybe the corporate defacto government is putting a squeeze on you to keep the sheep coralled and the fictions in existence. After reading the Jurat you provided herein and based on My own understanding and Our Heavenly Fathers commandments, I cannot participate in the format provided based on the following reasons: 1. The teminology used in said "Ack and Jurat" are dealing with fictions by using such terms as "person(s)" and "authorized capacity(ies)" "authorized capacity(ies)" means having a position of certain control over said fiction or the fiction's name. Who determines what authority or power is given to whom over such fiction or fiction name? We know that the corporate de facto government system has created fictons in ones likeness--a mirror image of the real man or woman for purposes of control. By participating in such documentation, We would keep the fiction in existence. 2. "certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY" is an oath which God in His Word suggested not to do. See Matthew 5:33-37, James 5:12. To "Perjure" is to lie under oath. per·jure (pûr'jer) tr.v. per·jured, per·jur·ing, per·jures Law To make (oneself) guilty of perjury by deliberately testifying falsely under oath. [Middle English perjuren, from Old French perjurer, from Latin periurare : per-, per- + iurare, to swear; see yewes- in Indo-European roots.] 3. The term "Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed)" is similar to "2." above and the info therein applies hereto. God says not to swear and also says not to make an oath but only to speak the truth. Keep in mind that "My word is My bond." Why is "(or affirmed)" in parenthesis and not the word "sworn"? They could have very well written "Subscribed and affirmed (or sworn to)" or "Subscribed, affirmed, and or sworn to". By putting "or affirmed" within () or [], places itself outside the wording of such documentation or is not a part of the documentation. Therefore, in reality, one is swearing. 4. In referrence to "under the laws of the State of California", flesh and blood, Free men and women are not created to be under the laws of a fiction. A fiction is usually a counterfiet of what is real. We know who is the great counterfieter (Satan). "California state" is a geographic area or local, but "STATE OF CALIFORNIA" is a fiction, being a counterfiet of "California state" and has now become a counterfeit god in the same likeness as the UNITED STATES. We are created by God, The Creator, and not by man's created fictions or the figment of man's imagination. Therefore, We are to be under Our Creator's laws and commandments. Know who you are and who you are not. Know who is your Master and who is not. 5. "...the entity upon behalf of which..." does not make sense. 6. In regards to: "satisfactory evidence". Many people have been known to provide a counterfeit, forged, or altered Driver's license. Therefore, a Driver's license does not prove who one is. A Driver's license only proves that the name thereon is a fiction. We know who We are and who We are not. Again, "My word is My bond." Others, can testify of Me. As God's people and Ministers of The Truth, We cannot participate in such documention unless We are allowed to provide Our own language for notarizaton and evidence or witness as to who We are. Will you make an exception for Us as you did in the past? If not, why not? If you will not make an exception for Us, then We can no longer solicit or participate in your services. May Our heavenly Father (YHVH), in the name of Jesus (Yeshua), The Christ, Yahu'shuah the Messiah, bless each and every one of Us and be with Us in all of Our endeavors that are according to His will and for His glory.